Just because an entity is too big to fail, it doesn't necessarily mean it is also too big to fail YOU.
"Our insurance policy covers everything: fire, flood, tornado, meteor strike, zombie apocalypse, alien invasion and rise of the machines."
"Talking to you was a waste of time, but rest assured, i'm going to channel the frustration into the betterment of mankind."
If the only options you offer the community to voice their opinion is "make a fuss" and "ragequit", you are doing something horribly wrong.
Experimenting with an experimental feature, even though the benefits might not outweigh the drawbacks. The reasoning behind this behavior is unclear, even to myself.
Did you know that the phrase "held together by prayers and duct tape" translates into Russian as "by snot and black magic"?
"The problem, as i see it, is that i'm actually one of the better specimen in this community, a fact hardly inspiring confidence or optimism."
The government has almost all of the capacity to make your life miserable, but almost none of the accountability. I think it might have been better if it was the other way around but, then again, i'm not a real politologist.
Change one thing, change it all: What would the world look like if the day started at dawn instead of at midnight?
Keeping all your doors unlocked because you "have nothing worth stealing" is admirable, but dumb.
"Hey, doesn't she look like that actor, uh, what was her name?" — "Don't know who you're talking about, but she looks absolutely nothing like her."
Note to self: Whenever someone answers a "How do i...?" question with a "Why?", it's because they have no clue.
Contrary to a mirror, if you smash up a government, you REALLY get seven years of bad luck.